The General Assembly refused to protect a gender-specific condition explicitly, but the Court of Appeals concludes that protection may be implied as an artifact of “sex” and a basis for liability. The way this decision was written seems to open doors for arguments about other gender-specific medical situations that could be alleged as a factual basis for wrongful termination claims.

This Labor Day weekend, let us contemplate the ways that lawyers all over this country tout their achievements as “elite,” “super,” or...

The Chatham County case involved allegations of racketeering, elder abuse, and manufactured evidence.  It wound its way to the Court of Appeals and back twice.  Main characters pled the Fifth.

The North Carolina Supreme Court this week established a test for judges asked to order a business divorce of “deadlocked” partners in LLCs.